According to investigative reporting by Emily Steel, Uber’s driver‑screening rules in many U.S. states permit individuals with serious criminal records to continue driving for the ride‑hailing service, provided the convictions occurred more than seven years ago.
Since the policy’s inception, a number of drivers who met the “seven‑year rule” have been accused of sexual assault, harassment, or other forms of misconduct toward riders. These incidents have raised questions about the adequacy of Uber’s background‑check thresholds and the company’s responsibility to protect its users.
Uber maintains that its safety standards comply with local regulations and that the seven‑year window is a common industry benchmark. The company says it continuously monitors driver behavior and removes any individual who is found to have violated its policies.
Advocacy groups and lawmakers are urging Uber to tighten its vetting process, arguing that the severity of a conviction—rather than its age—should be the primary factor in determining driver eligibility.