Syria Rebuilds Its Armed Forces, Leaning on Loyalists and Religious Instruction

Background

Since the end of the civil war, the Syrian government has embarked on an ambitious project to reconstruct its military from the ground up. The effort focuses on recruiting veterans who remained loyal to the regime and integrating religious education into training programs.

Key Strategies

The new recruitment drive emphasizes three main pillars:

• Loyalist Networks: Former militia members and longtime supporters of President Bashar al‑Assad are given priority in enlistment.
• Religious Curriculum: New soldiers undergo courses that blend conventional combat training with Islamic teachings intended to boost morale and ideological cohesion.
• Foreign Assistance: While Russia and Iran continue to supply equipment and advisors, Damascus insists on “Syria‑first” personnel policies.

Critics’ Concerns

Human‑rights groups and defense analysts argue that this approach undermines the professionalization of the armed forces. They point out that:

• Prioritizing loyalty over merit may lead to a lack of tactical expertise among the ranks.
• Embedding religious instruction could blur the line between state and sectarian interests, risking further internal divisions.
• The rapid rebuild, without comprehensive logistical planning, leaves the army “hobbled” in terms of readiness and operational capability.

Government Response

In a recent press conference, the Ministry of Defense defended the policy, stating that “a disciplined, ideologically committed force is essential for safeguarding Syria’s sovereignty.” Officials claim that the blend of loyalty and faith will create a more resilient military capable of confronting both internal threats and external pressures.

Outlook

As Syria continues to reshape its armed forces, the tension between political loyalty and professional competence remains a focal point of debate. Observers will be watching closely to see whether the new recruitment model can deliver the strategic stability the government promises, or if it will further expose the army’s structural weaknesses.