Decision May Provide Immediate Relief to Millions of Recipients

In a decisive ruling issued late Sunday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit halted the Trump administration’s attempt to withhold a significant portion of funding for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). The judgment temporarily restores the full allotment of federal dollars that had been slated for reduction.

Background of the Dispute

The administration argued that cutting SNAP funds was necessary to curb federal spending and encourage state‑level reforms. However, critics contended that the move would jeopardize food security for an estimated 38 million Americans who rely on the program for basic nutrition.

Court’s Reasoning

Judge Emily C. Gallagher, writing for the three‑judge panel, emphasized that the Treasury’s proposed cuts lacked a clear statutory basis. “Congress authorized the full funding level for SNAP, and the executive branch cannot unilaterally diminish that commitment without explicit legislative approval,” she wrote.

Implications for SNAP Beneficiaries

The injunction means that, for now, states will continue to receive the full federal share of SNAP benefits, preventing an anticipated drop in monthly allotments for many households. Advocacy groups hailed the ruling as a “vital lifeline” for low‑income families facing rising food prices.

Next Steps

The administration has signaled its intent to appeal the decision to the Supreme Court, arguing that the funding issue falls within the executive’s budgetary discretion. Meanwhile, SNAP participants can expect the program to operate as usual while the legal battle continues.