The European Union announced that the recent tightening of visa regulations for Russian nationals is a direct response to a series of sabotage attacks that have taken place across the continent. In the EU’s statement, officials emphasized that the measure is intended to safeguard security and prevent further hostile actions on European soil.
For many Russians living abroad, the policy feels less like a security precaution and more like a blanket punishment. “We are ordinary people trying to rebuild our lives here,” said Irina Petrova, a former teacher now residing in Berlin. “The new rules treat us as if we are all complicit, regardless of our personal stance on the war.”
Similar sentiments were echoed in Paris, where a group of Russian entrepreneurs gathered to discuss the impact of the visa changes. “Our businesses depend on the ability to travel freely,” noted Alexei Smirnov, owner of a tech startup. “The restrictions threaten not only our livelihoods but also the cultural exchange we foster between Russia and Europe.”
Human‑rights organizations have warned that collective measures can alienate diaspora communities and fuel resentment. Amnesty International highlighted that policies targeting an entire nationality, rather than specific individuals linked to illicit activities, risk violating principles of proportionality and non‑discrimination.
Meanwhile, EU policymakers defend the decision, arguing that the security threat is real and that the visa regime is a necessary deterrent. “We are not aiming at ordinary citizens,” a spokesperson for the European Commission said. “Our focus is on preventing further sabotage and protecting our citizens.
The debate underscores a growing tension between security concerns and the rights of expatriate communities. As the EU finalizes the new visa framework, many Russian exiles hope for a more nuanced approach that distinguishes between state actors and ordinary residents seeking a peaceful life in Europe.