Larry Summers Pulls Back From Public Engagements After Epstein Email Leak

New correspondence reveals prolonged contact with the convicted financier

Larry Summers, former president of Harvard University and ex‑U.S. Treasury secretary, announced that he will curtail his public commitments in light of recently disclosed emails showing he kept in touch with Jeffrey Epstein for years after the billionaire faced sex‑trafficking charges.

The emails, obtained by investigative reporters, span from 2010 to 2019 and include messages about conference arrangements, fundraising ideas, and personal updates. Although Summers has denied any involvement in Epstein’s illegal activities, the correspondence suggests a continued professional relationship well after the 2008 non‑prosecution agreement that sparked widespread criticism.

In a brief statement released to the press, Summers said, “Given the renewed scrutiny surrounding my past interactions, I believe it is appropriate to step back from speaking engagements and advisory roles while I review the matter thoroughly.” He added that he remains “committed to transparency” and will cooperate with any further inquiries.

Harvard University has also issued a response, noting that “the institution’s leadership has no ongoing ties to Jeffrey Epstein and remains dedicated to upholding the highest standards of ethical conduct.” The university’s spokesperson emphasized that the email exchange does not implicate the university in any wrongdoing.

The revelations have reignited debate over the extent of Epstein’s network among elite academic and political circles. Critics argue that the continued contact by high‑profile figures like Summers underscores a broader pattern of ignoring or minimizing the severity of Epstein’s alleged crimes.

Legal experts note that while the emails alone may not constitute criminal conduct, they could influence public perception and potentially affect future appointments or speaking opportunities for those involved. Summers’ decision to step back is seen by some as a proactive move to mitigate reputational damage.

As the story develops, additional documents and testimonies are expected to emerge, further illuminating the nature of the relationships between prominent individuals and the late financier.