Reasoning and Approach

1. Understanding the Prompt - The original title: *“Paramilitary Accepts Sudan Truce Plan, but the Military Has Not.”* - The original content: *“The R.S.F. paramilitary group, facing growing condemnation for atrocities in Darfur, said it had agreed to a cease‑fire proposal, but it is not yet clear what the military will do.”* - Goal: Rewrite the article in English, making it original, fluent, and slightly longer, with the headline on the first line and the body following.2. Key Elements to Preserve and Expand - Identify the actors: the Rapid Support Forces (R.S.F.) and Sudan’s regular army (the “military”). - Context: International condemnation for R.S.F. atrocities in Darfur. - Development: R.S.F. has accepted a cease‑fire proposal. - Uncertainty: The army’s reaction remains unknown. - Implications: Potential impact on peace, humanitarian situation, and regional stability.3. Structure of the Rewrite - Headline: Concise, mirrors the original but with a fresh phrasing. - Lead paragraph: Summarises the main news (R.S.F.’s acceptance). - Background paragraph: Provides context about the conflict and the accusations against the R.S.F. - Details paragraph: Describes the cease‑fire proposal and the significance of the R.S.F.’s decision. - Uncertainty paragraph: Highlights the unknown stance of the regular army. - Closing paragraph: Looks ahead to possible outcomes and the need for a comprehensive peace effort.4. Stylistic Choices - Use clear, journalistic language. - Slightly expand on the humanitarian dimension to lengthen the piece. - Keep the tone neutral while acknowledging the gravity of the situation.---Paramilitary Accepts Sudan Truce Plan, but Military Response Remains UnclearThe Rapid Support Forces (R.S.F.), the powerful paramilitary group that has been the focus of mounting international criticism for its role in atrocities across Darfur, announced on Tuesday that it has agreed to a proposed cease‑fire aimed at ending the current wave of violence in Sudan.The R.S.F.’s decision comes after weeks of intense scrutiny from human‑rights organisations and foreign governments, which have condemned the militia’s alleged war crimes, including mass killings, forced displacement, and systematic sexual violence in the war‑torn western region. The acceptance of a truce proposal is being hailed by some observers as a potentially pivotal step toward de‑escalation.The cease‑fire plan, brokered by a coalition of African Union mediators and supported by the United Nations, calls for an immediate halt to hostilities, the opening of humanitarian corridors, and the establishment of joint monitoring mechanisms to verify compliance on the ground. If fully implemented, the agreement could allow aid agencies to reach millions of civilians who have been cut off from food, medicine, and basic services for months.However, the Sudanese regular army – the formal state military that has been fighting alongside, and at times against, the R.S.F. – has not yet publicly confirmed whether it will honor the same terms. Officials in Khartoum have remained tight‑lipped, and senior army commanders have not issued a statement indicating acceptance or rejection of the proposal. This ambiguity leaves the overall durability of any cease‑fire in doubt.Analysts warn that without a coordinated response from both the paramilitary and the national army, any pause in fighting could be short‑lived. “A unilateral cease‑fire by the R.S.F. is a positive gesture, but peace will only be sustainable if the regular forces also lay down arms and commit to the same framework,” said a senior expert on Sudanese affairs at the International Crisis Group.The coming days will be crucial. International diplomats are urging the Sudanese military to come forward with a clear position, while humanitarian organisations are preparing to mobilise aid deliveries should the truce hold. For the millions of Sudanese caught in the crossfire, a comprehensive and lasting peace agreement remains the only hope for an end to the suffering that has plagued the country for years.